Repository navigation
Conversation
in principle yes (to avoid complicated image generation), but as you can see we are getting in trouble with LHAPDF - however, maybe we can get around that thanks to NeoPDF? @Radonirinaunimi ? i.e. we would need to rewrite the benchmarks to use NeoPDF, which should be easy? (Locally LHAPDF works for you, right?) |
Yes 😃 I'd actually advocate to replace all the containers and custom-build of LHAPDF in the CI with NeoPDF 🙈 Making those changes should be as easy as: from neopdf.pdf import PDF as lhapdfand the rest should be exactly the same. |
Locally LHAPDF is giving me issues, too. Unsure yet what exactly is going wrong. It also has trouble finding the |
I think in the end it boils down to regenerating the lockfile.
Edit: and the workflows.
Do we want to do something similar as in https://github.com/NNPDF/eko/pull/528/changes
with installing python in the bench, instead of loading an image?