Skip to content

GH-54903: [OSS-Fuzz fuzzing] Add new fuzzer targets json processing - #54886

Open
arthurscchan wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
arthurscchan:fuzz/json-fuzz-target
Open

arthurscchan wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
arthurscchan:fuzz/json-fuzz-target

Conversation

@arthurscchan

@arthurscchan arthurscchan commented Oct 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR creates a new OSS-Fuzz fuzzer with corpora/dict targets json processing, together with google/oss-fuzz#16328 to enable a new fuzzer for project arrow. This PR is the 1st PR aiming to improve the overall fuzzing coverage and effectiveness of the arrow project, mentioned in #54903.

Signed-off-by: Arthur Chan <arthur.chan@adalogics.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

This pull request has been automatically converted to a draft because its title doesn't match Arrow's required format.

If this is not a minor PR, could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose

Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?

GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

After updating the title, you can mark the pull request as ready for review.

See also:

@github-actions
github-actions Bot marked this pull request as draft October 21, 2026 07:08
@arthurscchan arthurscchan changed the title OSS-Fuzz: Add new fuzzer targets json processing GH-54903: [OSS-Fuzz fuzzing] Add new fuzzer targets json processing Oct 21, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #54903 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@arthurscchan
arthurscchan marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2026 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant