[manufacturist]

👀 Live preview

🚧 To do

• If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
• Perform a self-review of the changes
• Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

[github-actions]

Overall readability score: 54.51 (🟢 +0.04)

File	Readability
github-integration.md	59.12 (🟢 +5.79)
jira-integration.md	43.63 (🟢 +3.5)
does-codacy-place-limits-on-the-code-analysis.md	39.7 (🟢 +0)
codacy-ai.md	59.18 (🟢 +2.25)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
github-integration.md	59.12	44.64	10.48	11.9	11.48	7.31
	🟢 +5.79	🟢 +1.32	🟢 +0.92	🟢 +1.1	🟢 +0.88	🟢 +0.36
jira-integration.md	43.63	29.08	14.03	15.3	11.84	7.74
	🟢 +3.5	🟢 +1.52	🟢 +0.75	🟢 +0.9	🟢 +0.12	🟢 +0.15
does-codacy-place-limits-on-the-code-analysis.md	39.7	37.5	13.88	13.3	14.03	9.42
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0
codacy-ai.md	59.18	37.81	10.04	11.8	12.12	6.94
	🟢 +2.25	🟢 +0.31	🟢 +0.44	🟢 +0.3	🟢 +0.17	🟢 +0.24

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	54.51	42.96	10.81	12.28	12.32	7.95
	🟢 +0.04	🟢 +0.01	🟢 +0.01	🟢 +0.01	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

✅ No blocking issues noticed

No blocking findings were identified from the supplied review results.

Test suggestions

• Verify all new internal links and anchors resolve, including the ticket-context and learning-from-reviews links.
• Verify the documented AI Reviewer behavior and limits against the implemented product behavior.

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify all new internal links and anchors resolve, including the ticket-context and learning-from-reviews links.
2. Verify the documented AI Reviewer behavior and limits against the implemented product behavior.

Make this review better

_{TIP Fill in the PR description template so the reviewer can verify the PR's intent.}

_{TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}

[lventura-codacy]

nit

Suggested change

	From these, it picks up what your team cares about and what to stop flagging. To steer it, react 👍 to the AI Reviewer's comments that are right, and reply to the ones that are wrong saying why.
	From these, it picks up on what your team cares about and what to stop flagging. To steer it, react with a👍 to the AI Reviewer's comments that are right, and reply to the ones that are wrong explaining why.