[ibuziuk]

Description of Changes

Summarize the changes you made as part of this pull request.

Related Issue(s)

Link the GitHub/GitLab/JIRA issues that are related to this PR.

Acceptance Criteria

Testing and documentation do not need to be complete in order for this PR to be approved. However, tracking issues must be opened for missing testing/documentation.

New testing and documentation issues can be opened under devfile/api/issues.

You can check the respective criteria below if either of the following is true:

• There is a separate tracking issue opened and that issue is linked in this PR.
• Testing/documentation updates are contained within this PR.

If criteria is left unchecked please provide an explanation why.

• Unit/Functional tests

• QE Integration test

• Documentation

• Client Impact

Tests Performed

Explain what tests you personally ran to ensure the changes are functioning as expected.

How To Test

Instructions for the reviewer on how to test your changes.

Notes To Reviewer

Any notes you would like to include for the reviewer.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Developer Experience
  • Added recommendations for two coding assistant extensions in the editor’s suggested extensions. These suggestions are available when setting up the project in Visual Studio Code.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ibuziuk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 29f6ac5a-8e28-429a-bd11-2dab00fa932f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ef4cfd and e1b38f4.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1

• .vscode/extensions.json

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

The VS Code extension recommendations now include openai.chatgpt and Anthropic.claude-code.

Changes: VS Code Extension Recommendations

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add extension recommendations .vscode/extensions.json	The recommended extensions list adds openai.chatgpt and Anthropic.claude-code.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Feature

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e1b38

The change adds two VS Code extension recommendations. No actionable merge-blocking issue is established, so it is ready to merge with normal checks.

### Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to e1b38

The changed surface does not map to a changed system, dependency edge, entrypoint, or external dependency.

Changed systems: None identified.

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Before / after behavior

• observed — Modified behavior in .vscode/extensions.json: Added the openai.chatgpt and Anthropic.claude-code extension recommendations.

Pre-merge checks: 5

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title clearly and concisely describes the addition of OpenAI and Anthropic extensions to the VS Code recommendations.
Docstring Coverage		No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

⚠️ This pull request has been flagged as potential spam (promotional) by CodeRabbit slop detection and should be reviewed carefully.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[michael-valdron]

@ibuziuk Let's address #1773 first before proceeding with AI tool recommendations, though there has been some AI contributions (as well as Devfile Registry AI stacks) done already I feel having an official governance to place our stance on the usage before we recommend tools.

Our team wants to align Devfile with the AI policy of Linux Foundation being a CNCF project which as I've seen so far is fairly on par with our policy at Red Hat.

I'll open a discussion topic with the team to resolve this topic soon so to not keep this waiting too long.

cc @elsony