Skip to content

CLDSRV-1039: Authorize a copy of a specific source version like a GetObject - #6331

Open
tcarmet wants to merge 3 commits into
development/9.3from
bugfix/CLDSRV-1039-versioned-copy-source-authorization
Open

tcarmet wants to merge 3 commits into
development/9.3from
bugfix/CLDSRV-1039-versioned-copy-source-authorization

Conversation

@tcarmet

@tcarmet tcarmet commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

When a copy named a specific version of its source (?versionId=, including null), the source read was checked as a GetObject, while the identity check had been made for GetObjectVersion. So the requester's identity policy was never applied, and bucket policy statements on s3:GetObjectVersion were ignored. A copy of a specific version is now authorized like a GetObject of that version, and its quota is still evaluated. As a result, a bucket policy Deny meant to protect every version must cover s3:GetObjectVersion (or s3:GetObject*), not only s3:GetObject.

…Object

Authorize the source of a versioned copy with objectGetVersion, the action
checked by the authorization service, so its implicit deny is no longer read
as an allow and bucket policy statements on s3:GetObjectVersion apply. Keep
evaluating quotas for such a copy.
@bert-e

bert-e commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello tcarmet,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval ⭐
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status ⭐
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA ⭐
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix ⭐
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check ⭐
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval ⭐
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval ⭐
/bypass_source_branch_lineage Bypass the cross-branch contamination check ⭐
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request.
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-1039 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.3.24

  • 9.4.9

  • 9.5.0

  • 9.6.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-1039, or the target
branch of this pull request.

Comment thread lib/api/apiUtils/quotas/quotaUtils.js Outdated
Comment on lines +258 to +259
const copySourceApiName = apiName === 'objectGetVersion' ? 'objectGet' : apiName;
if (actionNeedQuotaCheckCopy(copySourceApiName, apiMethod)) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks kinda convoluted to me, as actionNeedQuotaCheckCopy is a super simple function that may not deserve to be in Arsenal IMHO.

I think one of the following could be done:

  • the whole logic could probably be just pasted there and then the new objectGetVersion case be inserted naturally in the tested condition
  • the copy-specific actions may be inserted in the actionNeedQuotaCheck constant object in arsenal, and the extra source action condition can be pasted in here, but this may have side-effects as actionNeedQuotaCheck is used elsewhere.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. I went with your first option and inlined the condition, so objectGetVersion is now handled directly in the check and the Arsenal helper is no longer used here. It's in a separate commit (e3d8467) so it's easier to review, and I'll squash it once approved.

@leif-scality leif-scality left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. This fixes CLDSRV-1039 and I found no regressions. #6324 should be merged too, to close the remaining cross-bucket case (CLDSRV-1021).

@davidtencer For the release notes: users or roles allowed s3:GetObject but not s3:GetObjectVersion will now get AccessDenied when they copy a specific version (matches AWS).

@bert-e

bert-e commented Oct 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-1039 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.3.26

  • 9.4.11

  • 9.5.3

  • 9.6.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-1039, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.35%. Comparing base (5800ceb) to head (e3d8467).
⚠️ Report is 19 commits behind head on development/9.3.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/api/apiUtils/quotas/quotaUtils.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/api/objectCopy.js 91.33% <ø> (ø)
lib/api/objectPutCopyPart.js 86.98% <ø> (-0.60%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.3    #6331      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            85.33%   85.35%   +0.01%     
===================================================
  Files                  206      206              
  Lines                13440    13441       +1     
===================================================
+ Hits                 11469    11472       +3     
+ Misses                1971     1969       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 68.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
file-ft-tests-null-compat 68.88% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
kmip-ft-tests 28.36% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
mongo-v0-ft-tests 69.56% <0.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 69.51% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 36.80% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
s3c-ft-tests-v0 64.02% <0.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
s3c-ft-tests-v0-null-compat 64.08% <0.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
s3c-ft-tests-v1 63.99% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
sur-tests 36.78% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
sur-tests-inflights 37.79% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unit 71.69% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
utapi-v2-tests 34.61% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants