Skip to content

blog: Add ZTVP architecture overview article reference - #749

Merged
laubai merged 1 commit into
validatedpatterns:mainfrom
p-rog:blogs-ztvp-update
Nov 5, 2026
Merged

laubai merged 1 commit into
validatedpatterns:mainfrom
p-rog:blogs-ztvp-update

Conversation

@p-rog

@p-rog p-rog commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adds a blog entry for Part 4 of the ZTVP security series, linking to the recently published Red Hat blog post on implementing zero trust with the Layered Zero Trust Validated Pattern.

The post summarises the full ZTVP layered model (Layer 0 foundation + Layer 1 feature sets), the three concrete user journeys (data protection, secure supply chain, compliance evidence), and the framework alignment across NIST 800-207, NIST 800-53, CISA ZTMM v2.0, EO 14028, and DoD ZT RA.

Red Hat blog: https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/buzzword-blueprint-implementing-zero-trust-red-hat-openshift-layered-zero-trust-validated-pattern

Changes

  • New file: content/blog/2026-10-22-zero-trust-buzzword-to-blueprint.adoc

Made with Cursor

Adds a blog entry for Part 4 of the ZTVP security series, linking to
the Red Hat blog article on implementing zero trust with the Layered
Zero Trust Validated Pattern.

The post summarises the full ZTVP layered model (Layer 0 foundation +
Layer 1 feature sets), the three concrete user journeys (data
protection, secure supply chain, compliance evidence), and the
framework alignment across NIST 800-207, NIST 800-53, CISA ZTMM v2.0,
EO 14028, and DoD ZT RA.

Red Hat blog: https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/buzzword-blueprint-implementing-zero-trust-red-hat-openshift-layered-zero-trust-validated-pattern

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @p-rog. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a validatedpatterns member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Tip

We noticed you've done this a few times! Consider joining the org to skip this step and gain /lgtm and other bot rights. We recommend asking approvers on your previous PRs to sponsor you.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/M label Oct 28, 2026
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from kquinn1204 and laubai October 28, 2026 14:05

@sabre1041 sabre1041 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ocpdocs-previewbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Thu Oct 29 01:39:32 - The preview is ready at:
https://749--patternsdocs-pr.netlify.app

@laubai laubai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks very much @p-rog!

FYI, it doesn't look like we have part 3 of this series on the validatedpatterns blog - did you want to write something up for that as well, or skip it? Will wait to hear from you before I merge.

@p-rog

p-rog commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Looks good, thanks very much @p-rog!

FYI, it doesn't look like we have part 3 of this series on the validatedpatterns blog - did you want to write something up for that as well, or skip it? Will wait to hear from you before I merge.

I skipped part 3 intentionally, because it's more focused on network policies handling and agentic network policies architect. We have there references to ZTVP and how we used it in ZTVP network policies creation though. @sabre1041 what do you think about part 3 blog post: https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/closing-loop-network-policy-intent-verified-reality ? Should we promote it at VP project blog posts?

@laubai

laubai commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@p-rog @sabre1041 Before I saw you'd posted this PR, I'd written up a summary/teaser for both posts as part of PR 750 - we could just do something like this? OK to skip, though - up to you :)

@p-rog

p-rog commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@p-rog @sabre1041 Before I saw you'd posted this PR, I'd written up a summary/teaser for both posts as part of PR 750 - we could just do something like this? OK to skip, though - up to you :)

Sure, if it's OK to post the 3rd blog post as well in the VP blogs page, then let's do it :)

@laubai do you want me to update this PR or maybe close this this one and reopen your #750 ?

@laubai

laubai commented Nov 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'll reopen and update my #750 to only contain part 3 of 4 as long as you're OK with its contents :) Thankyou!

@laubai
laubai merged commit 9c65dfc into validatedpatterns:main Nov 5, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants